|
Radio Room
Noise In Shack: Switching
Power Supplies
Noise In The Shack
One of the greatest challenges to successful
radio communications is noise. Nature hosts countless radio transmitters,
including the sun, our atmosphere, and celestial objects, which
produce signals that compete with, and often overwhelm faint man-made
signals that carry the intelligence we are interested in. Hams call
this QRN.
To this, we add the burden of noise signals
that are the result of the unintentional radiation of RF from
electrical and electronic devices. A faulty insulator on a power
pole can produce a buzz that blocks large segments of the HF ham
bands. SCR or TRIAC-based lamp dimmers can do the same. Computer
equipment can generate "birdies" or "hash" that
drives a receiver's AGC, reducing sensitivity. A water pump or a
power tool switching on and off can produce annoying pops and crackles.
One of the greatest threats that amateur radio has ever faced comes
in the form of noise generated by so-called BPL systems. The idea
of BPL is to provide broadband Internet service by supplying data
through existing power lines. The problem is that the idea ignores
the basic rules of physics, with the result that data-carrying power
lines can blanket large regions with intense electrical noise. The
noise is so bad that it can render large segments of the radio spectrum
completely unusable.
An increasingly common source of man-made
radio noise is the switching power supply. Switching power supplies,
or switchers, appear in a vast array of consumer electronic devices,
and are appearing more and more. They are now found even in the
ubiquitous "wall-wart" configuration.
How does a switcher work, how does it compare
to the classical linear power supply, and why does it generate so
much noise? The answer to these questions begins with an analogy.
Regulated Power Supplies -
An Analogy
Lets suppose you have a large tub or "kiddie
pool." The pool has a small hole or drain in its bottom, where
water is free to escape. To fill the pool, and hopefully maintain
a fixed level in it, you use an outdoor faucet and a garden hose.
You can spin the faucet handle to control the flow of water into
the pool--- a little, a lot, or any rate in between--- in order
to maintain a fixed level in the pool.
This system is a hydraulic representation
of the classic linear power supply. The garden hose represents the
supply's energy source (usually rectified power from a transformer).
The pool represents the innate storage capacity of the supply (usually
in the form of a large filter capacitor). The drain in the pool
represents the energy that the power supply is delivering to the
load, and the pressure of water delivered to the load (voltage)
is related to the water level in the pool, which is why it is important
that you maintain a closely controlled level.
To apply the analogy to a switching supply,
you keep the pool, the drain, and the requirement to maintain a
constant level in the pool. However, instead of using a garden hose
to fill the pool, you arrange for a friend to deliver one-gallon
buckets at brief, regular intervals. When the pool drains below
the desired level, you call upon the friend to deliver buckets,
which you subsequently dump into the pool. The moment that the level
of the pool rises above the target level, you cancel your order
for the next bucket. When the pool level falls below the target
again, you resume delivery.
The primary difference between the linear
and switching supply, then, is the manner in which water (energy)
is added to the "pool." In the first case, water is added
in a continuous fashion, throttled up and down depending upon the
level of the pool. In the second case, water is added to the pool
in a discrete manner, as fixed, uniform, and repetitive quantities
of water. Control of the level of water in the pool is achieved
by scheduling or canceling the delivery of future water buckets.
Given the logistics in delivering multiple
buckets of water, or for that matter, discrete pulses of electricity,
you might wonder why anyone would go the trouble of building
power supplies this way. There are two reasons I can think of.
The first has to do with the way transistors
work. In most linear power supplies, a transistor is used as the
"faucet" by which to control the flow of electricity from
the source to load. Ultimately, all of the current delivered to
the load must first pass through the transistor (in fact, transistors
used in this fashion are referred to as "pass transistors.)
You might think of the pass transistor, in loose terms, as a rheostat
or programmable resistor. The pass transistor, like a rheostat,
meters the energy passing through it by dissipating unwanted energy
as heat.
Heat produced by the transistor is really
wasted energy, because it represents energy that was not used for
any useful purpose. Thus, linear power supplies tend not to be very
energy efficient. Since semiconductors like transistors suffer from
exposure to heat, it is vitally important that the pass transistor
be anchored to an appropriately large heat sink. The need for a
heat sink adds to the cost, size, and weight of a linear power supply.
In the case of the switching supply, the pass
transistor does not act as a rheostat, but as a switch, meaning
it is either fully on, or fully off. When the transistor is on,
it delivers a "bucket" of energy to the load, when it
is off, it does not. When a transistor is fully on, very little
of the energy passing through it is wasted as heat. When a transistor
is fully off, negligible current flows,so again, very little energy
is wasted. Since the pass transistor in a switching supply only
resides in one of these two states, switching supply circuits are
highly efficient. High efficiency means that little waste heat is
produced. Thus, heat sinks can be reduced in size or even omitted,
making the supply smaller and cheaper to produce.
The inefficiencies of the linear supply become
unacceptable when a linear supply must regulate a relatively low
voltage output given a relatively high voltage input. In this case,
excessive amounts of heat must be dissipated by the pass transistor,
so much in fact, that it renders the design impractical. To get
around this, linear supplies are fitted with a transformer to convert
and reduce the input voltage to a level that is somewhat closer
to the desired output voltage.
This brings to me the second reason why switching
supplies are attractive. Transformers, of the type used in linear
supplies, are expensive and heavy. They contain lots of copper
wire, and steel plates that compose the transformer's core. The
more current that the power supply must supply load, the larger
the transformer must be. This is because transformer capacity is
related to the cross sectional area of the core and the gauge
of the wire used to wind the transformer. Transformer size is also
dictated by its operating frequency. As a rule of thumb, the lower
the frequency, the larger the transformer's core (and thus the transformer)
must be. Supply mains in the United States oscillate at 60 Hz. This
is a low frequency, requiring comparatively large transformers.
Switching supplies, on the other hand, do
not necessarily need input transformers. The high efficiency of
transistor switches means that a low-voltage regulated output can
be sourced directly from a high-voltage input. If safety considerations
demand the use of a transformer to provide isolation, switching
supplies win again. The rate at which "buckets" of energy
are deposited into the "pool" can be on the order of 10,000
-100,000 times per second or even faster. At these high frequencies,
a transformer's core can be made much smaller, and even fabricated
out of materials other than steel. Once again, the switcher can
be smaller, lighter, and cheaper.
So Why The Noise?
A clever fellow by the name of
Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier
determined through mathematical means that any complex waveform
can be described as the sum of a series of sine and cosine waves.
For example, if you were to
set up a sine wave oscillator to produce a 1 kHz signal, and you
displayed that signal on an oscilloscope, you'd see the smooth,
graceful, curved sine wave that one would expect.
However, if you added more oscillators
to the system, one at 3 kHz, one at 5 kHz, one at 7 kHz, and so
forth, and combined their outputs, the composite wave you would
have created would look very different. In fact, if you added enough
additional oscillators, tuned to odd multiples of the fundamental
frequency of 1 kHz, and you combined them in proper proportion,
the oscilloscope display might surprise you. In short, the screen
would display a square wave!
Obviously, this concept is reversible.
If a use a signal generator to produce a 1 kHz square wave, Fourier
tells us that, implicit in that signal, is an infinite series of
sine waves whose frequencies represent odd multiples of the fundamental
frequency. These additional waves are called harmonics.
Now consider an energy source
that is connected to switch that is opening and closing at regular
intervals, let's say 1 kHz. If you plot the output of the switch,
what does it look like? A square wave! However, implicit in that
square wave is a sequence of sine waves, whose frequencies lie at
odd multiples of 1 kHz. The 1 kHz switch produces harmonics at 3
kHz, 5 kHz, 7 kHz, and so on.
This property is not unique
to square waves. As I said before, any complex waveform contains
numerous sine waves. What is worth noting is that waveforms that
exhibit rapid rise or fall times, or "sharp edges," are
loaded with strong sine waves oscillating at many times the frequency
of the fundamental.
The connection between this
concept and our discussion of switching supplies should now be evident.
By its very nature, the switching supply produces the kind of waveforms
that are loaded with harmonics. In the case of a switching supply
operating at 200 kHz, the 3rd, 5th, and 7th harmonics lie right
in the middle of the AM broadcast band. These harmonics and higher
ones, leaking out of the power supply through its input or output
terminals, or simply radiating from the wiring on the supply's circuit
board, will wreak havoc with any nearby receiver.
Some manufacturers go to great
pains to suppress this type of electrical interference. They may
apply aggressive filters to the input and output sides of the supply,
and shield the electronics with a metallic box. Unfortunately, all
too often, they do not. In a future installment, I will describe
a few examples of switching supply interference that I've observed
in my shack, and what I could (or could not) do to resolve the problems.
Document Revision 1, xx/xx/2005
Document Revision 2, 10/14/2005
[Top]
|